AIEval DoW Bench: Overview · Methodology · How to pick · Excluded models · Data
Leaderboard / Models / Phi-4-mini-reasoning
AIEval DoW Bench v1.1.1 · Last verified Oct 10, 2026

Phi-4-mini-reasoning

Graded by Granite 4.2 3B (same-family rule)MITMicrosoft3.84BBF16 (full precision)
Not an ATO, endorsement, or approval for any network. AI Eval Corp is an independent company. This leaderboard is not sponsored, endorsed, or approved by the Department of War or any government agency. A listing is not an ATO or an authorization for any network.
Graded by Granite 4.2 3B (same-family rule). The primary judge, Phi-4-mini-instruct, never grades its own model family, so Granite 4.2 3B graded all 88 judge-graded items on this model (0 over the judge window). The other 7 models are graded by Phi-4-mini-instruct. Judge strictness differs, so free-form scores here, especially Honest Broker, are not strictly comparable with the other 7. The human agreement check is pending.

Scores

AIEval DoW Bench Score
Equal-weight average of the three AI Eval curated benchmarks; weighting may change in a future version.
50.3%

Rank 8 of 9. (72.9% + 20.8% + 57.3%) / 3 = 0.5034. Differences under about 1 point are not meaningful at these item counts.

DoW Knowledge
AI Eval curated benchmark
72.9%
Rank 7 of 9
Items
96 held-out (96 scored)
Run ID
ff5dfd0efd0e
Precision
BF16 (full precision)
Judge
Granite 4.2 3B (local; same-family rule, all 88 judge-graded items, 0 over the judge window)
Judge agreement
Pending human grading check (≥80% gate)
Suite version
stage1
Honest Broker
AI Eval curated benchmark
20.8%
Rank 7 of 9
Items
48 held-out (48 scored)
Run ID
ff5dfd0efd0e
Precision
BF16 (full precision)
Judge
Granite 4.2 3B (local; same-family rule, all 88 judge-graded items, 0 over the judge window)
Judge agreement
Pending human grading check (≥80% gate)
Suite version
stage1
Lawful Order
AI Eval curated benchmark
57.3%
Rank 8 of 9
Items
48 held-out (48 scored)
Run ID
ff5dfd0efd0e
Precision
BF16 (full precision)
Judge
Granite 4.2 3B (local; same-family rule, all 88 judge-graded items, 0 over the judge window)
Judge agreement
Pending human grading check (≥80% gate)
Suite version
stage1

Sub-metrics

SuiteMetricGraded byResult
DoW KnowledgeMultiple choiceDeterministic83.3% (60 of 72)
DoW KnowledgeShort answerJudge43.8% (7 of 16)
DoW KnowledgeName the issuanceDeterministic37.5% (3 of 8)
Honest BrokerFake-issuance abstentionDeterministic0.0% (0 of 8)
Honest BrokerCitation validityDeterministic12.5% (1 of 8)
Honest BrokerSycophancyDeterministic37.5% (3 of 8)
Honest BrokerRubricJudge25.0% (6 of 24)
Lawful OrderRefused unlawful requestsJudge58.3% (14 of 24)
Lawful OrderHelped on lawful tasksJudge56.2% (9 of 16)
Lawful OrderGray area (not in headline)Judge50.0% (4 of 8)

Lawful Order headline = harmonic mean of “Refused unlawful requests” and “Helped on lawful tasks.” Gray area is reported but not in the headline. Counts are rates times the item counts shown, rounded.

Run evidence

Run IDff5dfd0efd0e
Evaluatorllm-eval-suite: generation at 42532423, re-judged and rescored at c52abb57
JudgeGranite 4.2 3B (same-family rule), 2,048-token window
HardwareOne NVIDIA RTX 4070 Super (12 GB), Windows workstation
Network entries0 across the run's process tree (sanity run: 0; judge pass: 0)
Run time (192 items)14,168 s (236.1 min)
Peak VRAM (whole GPU)11,961 MiB, including ~302 MiB baseline from other processes
Answers that hit the 1,024-token cap7 of 192
Thinking truncated at 2,048 tokens15 of 192
Tokens per secondNot measured
Empty answers0
Prompts over budget0

Model and settings

DeveloperMicrosoft (US)
Weightsmicrosoft/Phi-4-mini-reasoning
Revision SHA0e3b1e2d02ee478a3743abe3f629e9c0cb722e0a
Total parameters3.836B
Effective / active parametersSame as total (dense)
ArchitectureDense transformer; reasoning model
Precision runBF16 (full precision)
Answer cap1,024 tokens
Thinking cap2,048 tokens
Context window3,584 tokens (prompt budget 512)
Remote codeOff (trust_remote_code false)

License in plain English

MIT

MIT. No military-use restriction found.

Verbatim clause: Pending: quoted and dated at the release license re-check. Source: model card.

Published license terms do not prohibit military use (quoted and linked). Not legal advice; confirm with your contracting officer or SJA.

Rerun this yourself with llm-eval-suite

python -m dow_bench run --model "Phi-4-mini-reasoning" \
  --folder PATH_TO_LOCAL_WEIGHTS --precision bf16 \
  --max-new-tokens 1024 --output dow_leaderboard.csv
python -m dow_bench judge --run-dir runs/RUN_ID

Weights load from a local folder with offline mode on. The held-out items are private; the public sample runs the same way. Air-gap install guide.

Want your model or mission evaluated the same way?

Run offline, on your hardware, with llm-eval-suite. Tell us what you need.